At the beginning the labor of individuals was globalized, but today everything is globalized except migrations. Therefore we guess that, as we feared us, globalization has not been perfect. Since the beginning of this year we are witnessing an immigration crisis in Europe, and, always, on its borders in the East and South, respectively. This involves us, inescapably, to develop a European policy of immigration far not developed that very mobility of people between different countries from the poorest to the richest, and it is, clearly recognizing that this produces very complex problems in the 21st century. And in this life to everything there is a limit, to be solved once and for all: we have too many immigrants. If he has to establish control over the arrival of the last, I wonder who they are illegal.

And then I want reasoning in the sense that we have to establish some minimum safety requirements, for its entry in the different States. All of which us routes to understand that I will occur in our minds an almost perfect globalized fear. He had told Mohandas_Gandhi that will not survive those cultures who intend to exclude others. And today this cultures is a reality. They want the immigrants come to work with their own hands, with their own cultures, with their own fears to a new world, I would say, where mobility and communication are at the fingertips.

And they are cultures, languages and religions unequal, that, naturally, have to live with those of other countries to achieve a better and more equitable world to build a true globalization. So anyone have to die of hunger, thirst, and justice. Not enough to extend beyond the seas a market economy, transferring capital (for money) where they may be more profitable, and, around the corner, again with pockets full of million euros, million must coexist as human beings that we are, most do not exploit the cheap labour, leaving the territories Once they have been victimized.

Indian Peoples

The demand of plurinationality implies, in Finally, the end of the political and cultural assimilationism that indigenous peoples have been victims for five centuries. The problem of the Indian is not matter of assimilation or integration into white, civilized society; the problem of the Indian problem of liberation, said indigenous leader Fausto Reinaga prescriptive in the 70s of the last century. And he added, referring to that liberating possibility: Europe has imposed on US their language, their religion, their history, their morale, their culture, his art. It now seeks to impose on us their version of the revolution, their strategies and tactics right. Since some decades ago indigenous peoples from different regions of Latin America traditional labor cheap and without trade union organization for the large estates of the agroexportadoras national bourgeoisies, and on the other hand, staff domestic urban middle and upper classes they come carried out a series of struggles in defense of their full rights and their territories, under different conditions and using various strategies. In that political dynamics are as their direct enemies to the nation States where they inhabit, which more than welcome them as citizens have them marginalized and repressed historically. In this logic they face armed and police forces of the countries of which they are part; landowners and their private armed groups; oil companies (generally foreign and lived in territories which the national States so racist and capital give them passing above the native peoples); mining and forestry companies, as well as fraccionadoras companies and hotel consortia, in a vindictive frame ranging from the political to the cultural. Carl Icahn often addresses the matter in his writings. No simplistic idealizations or mistificantes glorificaciones, there is no doubt that all these movements indigenous peoples constitute a challenge to the capitalist Western hegemonic discourse. Without raising a revolutionary choice in classist terms according to the classical Marxist conception, no doubt they are a stone in the shoe for the dominant conception.