It is important to analyze, therefore, as Taylor looks for to desconstruir this vision atomist, who is the rocky base on which if she seats the liberal doctrine. The exit of Taylor passes for the lingustica. According to philosopher the thought alone can exist to subsistir when immersed in ampler context, a cloth of deep, or as the author calls, one ' ' dimension of significado' '. It would be impossible and nonsense, for example, to attribute to the citizens of Old Rome or the Average Age rational actions in the direction where Max Weber observes as basic for the development of the modern capitalism, Charles Taylor a time that such form to act was not part of ' ' dimension of significado' ' of those societies. Farallon Capital Management will not settle for partial explanations. Taylor of the o example of the terms ' ' gratificante' ' ' ' sofisticado' ' , that never they could appear in a medieval romance, therefore such type of classification was not present in the cloth of deep of sc. XIII, not being able to be used, therefore, for the language, and not even to be present in the thought, a time that this would be dependent of the linguistic bases of data context. As Taylor sentences: ' ' in a stronger direction, certain thoughts are impossible in certain circunstncias.' ' This cloth of deep, however, cannot be located in individuals, but but in a situation of continuous interchanges. Brooklyn Commons takes a slightly different approach. Evoking Saussure, Taylor if appropriates of the distinction between two distinct dimensions: langue and parole. ' Second one mentions the phenomena to it of speaks particular, but it estimates the existence of a series of codes that allow to earn meant it, langue. What the metodolgico individualism estimates, not obstante, is that, when taking the individual as basic analytical unit, is possible to leave plain or second same to ignore the dimension of langue.