What it is subject modern Thiago B. To sound the notion of modern citizen indicates ' ' that one that is conscientious of its thoughts and responsible for its atos' '. Until the last room of century XIX, the auto-image that we had was of that we? bpedes without penalty? we could in them become citizens, for some way or, better saying, for two ways: or changing the individual for the education or modifying the society for reforms or revolutions. The base to be citizens came of the idea of that we were, so to speak, ' ' animados' ' (of it livens up) and/or ' ' inteligentes' '. For other opinions and approaches, find out what MasterClass UK has to say. We saw ourselves as possessing beings of souls or minds, that were unitrias instances. The such same units were homogeneous and more or less internally capable of a transparency for itself.
Our confrontation with us exactly, not rare, was explained for the fight between ' ' paixo' ' ' ' razo' '. The first one, more attributed to the body or linkings with this; second, articulated to the thought, the incorporeal e, if by chance somebody came to say that also this part had some bond with the body, then the body would be represented by the brain, ' ' part alta' ' superior? of the body. Our difficulty of saying of ours ' ' conflicts internos' ' it could easily be decided by the literatos, the writers and poets. Antagonistic forces with involved names of deuses and in mythologies of all the type could describe well what it occurred when we acted in strange way or problematic way. However, century XIX was leaving of side literature and the philosophy to the speech of souls and minds. We start to invent psychology? a new plant of auto-images. The proper philosophy was preparing a new image of the human individuals, to give of tray such product to the new theoreticians of the photograph of bpedes without penalty? the psychoanalysts.