has been a newsmaker for many years. His successes in the investment and commercial business spheres have brought him to the forefront of the news on many occasions. Many of the news articles and references he receives

Premium Carpets

In Russia, over the past decade, dozens of companies in thousands of major companies in the world. Russians are 62 billionaires, more than 100,000 could consider themselves a dollar millionaire. In Russia is increasingly carried out the world's largest political, economic and sport forums. And if they had concentrated solely in Moscow, now the geography is much broader – Competition in Sochi, the leaders of the APEC meeting in Vladivostok, the 27 th Summer Universiade in Kazan, an international economic forum in St. Petersburg, the World Chess Olympiad in Khanty-Mansiysk, World Political Forum 'Modern State: standards of democracy and effectiveness criteria' in Yaroslavl, etc.. In connection with these activities in various cities in Russia appear luxurious 5 * hotels and business centers, class "A" and "A +". And how consequence of growing demand and an expensive premium-quality carpeting.

If earlier Russia carpet of this quality was a rarity, and the company which is specialized engaged to supply such a carpet, do not were introduced to the market, now available to Russian consumers not only the premium carpet, but carpet of premium exclusive ". Note that in the premium segment there is a separation into two groups – more numerous, premium standard, and less numerous, premium exclusive. Let us try to understand the scope of this article, how they differ. But before we proceed to discuss differences on what unites them: 1. Premium carpeting – it is always woven carpet, which is the closest relative is widely known and very long, legendary handmade carpets from India and Iran.


Let us wake up! 2. Social division of the Work & Distribution of Tasks. The division of the work determines the relation between the individuals, itself, and with the material. It was thus since primeva (first) form of property human being, who if can verify in the tribal organization until the estamental. It wants to say, the effective division of the work happened when worked it was broken up it manual of the intellectual. With other words, the execution of the conception, in the way of effectively capitalist production.

In the manufacture already an exploration existed, however, the alienation that in it we find is of the body, because the necessary worker of its to know, of unitria form, for the execution of its work, what later, in the fordismo, for example, will not be a reality, because in this system he has a true unfamiliarity, on the part of the laborer, of the central reason of its work, certainly of the function of its work inside of the set of the company. Example: It only knows to manufacture part x, he does not understand function y and mechanisms z that it will cross it will play. Project: 1.Classificao and distribution of the employees according to its aptitudes. 2.Organizao of the work process 3.Perpertuao of the hierarchic structure and the social relations of the capitalists 4.O technician-scientific knowledge is not neutral, and being thus it favors the conditions and forms of exploration and alienation of the proletarian 5.O technician-scientific knowledge will go to inside strengthen the separation between execution and conception of the work, accenting the alienation. 6.A social division of the work, in the capitalism, if of the one in the exchange between individual and independent capitalists 7.Em the division of the work in the production, no individual worker produces a merchandise 8.A division of the work in the seio of the production estimates the distribution of the means of production as private property capitalist it 9.A division it work in the production is planned, regulated and supervised by the capitalist.


Consequently, main causes of food difficulties were largely outside its own agricultural production. Nevertheless, numerous studies and evaluations have shown that it was in 1970-1980-ies. aic Russia became increasingly obvious to lag behind the advanced countries of the world. Reforms led to a severe crisis of agriculture – and crop and livestock production. A characteristic feature of the agrarian reforms in transition economy is that the content of policy documents was transformed into practice exactly the opposite way.

As a result, have become apparent signs of destabilization of the agricultural sector, mainly related to: * liberalization of prices, which resulted in the aggravation of inter-sectoral disparity of economic relations and the removal of huge resources from agriculture; * privatization of processing and service enterprises and organizations Instead of creating conditions for development cooperation and agro-industrial integration; * focus on small-scale private enterprise that has not led to a more effective organizational structures; Standardization of credit policy that ignores the specifics of agricultural cycles of production, slow capital turnover, forced transition to a market economy without a minimum of necessary infrastructure that led to the ousting of the main part of rural producers to markets, transfer of functions of distribution of products to intermediaries, strengthening its market power processors and trade organizations. When privatization meant that the subsequently established mechanisms of transition the primary distribution of property in the hands of effective users. Such mechanisms has not been created, so much of the land and fixed assets without any use had been in practically stopped the normal functioning of households. Of positive change can be noted that on the basis of reorganized collective and state farms were created by joint stock companies, limited partnerships, agricultural production cooperatives, associations of peasant (farmer) facilities, collective agricultural enterprise. Formed in a rudimentary farming sector. By the beginning of the twenty-first century marked the following issues: * non-agricultural uses was derived about 30 million hectares of land; * removal of nutrients from the soil equipment decreased by 40-60%. Depreciation of equipment has reached 75%. Its rate of annual disposals in 3-4 times faster than the rate of renewal.

When you save such a trend a few years nothing will perform mechanical work. Debts farms exceed the annual revenue from the sale of all agricultural products. 55% of farms were unprofitable. During the reform government capital investment declined by 20 times. The most important principles of state regulation, are particularly important in a crisis of economic transition are: * financial support of agricultural producers, agricultural protectionism * * combination economic and social goals. In recent years, the current Russian government tried to take into consideration and rethink the mistakes made in the early years of transition. Now agriculture in our country develops the national project "Development of agriculture." Priority directions of development of this project is: * an accelerated development of livestock * stimulating the development of small-scale farming; * providing affordable housing for young families and young professionals in rural areas. The main objective of the project – the accelerated development of livestock and increased production of meat and milk for the gradual replacement of imported meat and dairy products. In throughout the Russian task was to increase by 2008, milk production by 4,5%, meat – by 7%. In Russia, state support of rural enterprise should not be limited budgetary subsidies and compensation. Is crucial to provide home care to rural entrepreneurs, including warranties of newly established farms, and support the formation of productive infrastructure, promoting establishment and development of reformed agricultural enterprises.