When we work with such absolutizao we have a confrontation of what it is to the reality of a logic of the possible one – as well as the ideal – surpassing the possibility extends a extrapolante goal to it, that is, metaphysics. The infinite would be what it exceeds the end, it is beyond the limit, or makes to inexist in-itself the limited one, ilimita. We must abiding in them by an interesting factor regarding the infinite, therefore when determining it as being what it is, we will be limiting it inside of a conceivable logic, therefore it starts to integrate a caught, sensible sphere the perception, then, no-extrapolante. The infinite is the finitude of what if it estimates inconceivable, conceiving in a linguistic goal and derivative of a racionalizante reality, authorizing to the man the possibility, or the attempt, of understanding semiotics of what it apprehends as sensorial simulation of its reality, or derivative of the influence of what it is on that while being, runs away from the extra-direction, the anti-goal, or metaphysics, that would be one antithesis of the reality. You may want to visit How much is MasterClass? to increase your knowledge. Caught ' ' in-finito' ' , we make possible to perscrutar the evidence of this determination while conceivable goal, distinguishing the imagtico field which the man if inserts in leases, that is, articulating a reality under the geographic perspective of a racionalizante language. The proper man, while concept, as he demonstrated Michel Foucault in ' well; ' The Words and the Coisas' ' , it does not pass of an idea that if it inside formatted of a neurolingustica limitation, authorizing to the individual its destruction, in view of that when determining what it is, we condition being a concretude of itself, aniquiliando what it surpasses such idea of being. In the same way the infinite finda in the proper idea of infinitude, leading the death of metaphysics, or better explicitando, the realism of the same one that contradiction becomes, for excluding ab aeterno and regimentar one intra walls linguistic. .
Philosophical concepts In a perspective more global, but specific and classic, certainly that it is possible to advance some ideas of what is, and also of what is not, the Philosophy. Because one is difficult, seno impossible, exactly definiz it, then let us take refuge us in the possibility to clarify what it is not, leaving to the reading patient of this work, the ungrateful task to conclude, with all its wisdom, what he is, then, the Philosophy. Invoking Julian Marias, some steps of its thought are transcribed: ‘ ‘ For Philosophy they had been understood, mainly, two things: a science and a way of life. (…) Both the non-separable dimensions are e, of fact, had never appeared total off.
The Philosophy is a life way, an essential way that, exactly, it consists of living in a certain science and, therefore claims, it and demands. It is therefore a science that determines the direction of philosophical life. (…) In Aristotle the Philosophy is a rigorous science, the wisdom or to know par excellence. The science of the things while they are. (…) After de Aristotle, from the death of Alexander and to follow the Roman Empire all, the Philosophy is emptied of scientific content and is gone converting, each time more, in a life way, of the calm and imperturbvel scholar, who is the human ideal of the time. In the Christianity with Saint Augustin and S. Toms the Philosophy will be moved enters a Theological science and a Philosophical science. At the time Modern, with Discardings, it is understood as a science for the life.
One is about living, to live in certain way what becomes, over all, what if it must make. The Philosophy as a life way that claims a science. Kant comes to speak to us of a pertaining to school concept and a mundane concept of Philosophy: for the first one, it is a system of all the philosophical knowledge; for as, it is the science of the relation of all the knowledge with the essential ends of the reason human being.
Thanks to the candle and techniques of naval construction improved the fencios they had dominated the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic coasts until century II a.C, when in 146 a.C the Romans had won and conquered Cartago, the greater and more important fencia city-state. The candle also served to the naval industry Greek. The inventors biredeem of it and trirreme had been the Greeks, fast boats with two and three rows of remadores and with candles. They had constructed colonies to the edges of the Aegean Sea, the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea, between them Bizncio, the more famous greater and. Techniques of naval construction developed by the fencios had passed to the domain of the Greeks and these to the Persians and Romans.
E the candle was present in all the times and places. Also vikings, considered sailor-warriors, had been great navigators. Many writers such as Frisch Financial offer more in-depth analysis. Deriving of the union of Nordic peoples they had arrived at the coasts of Canada, that had called Winland (land of the vines) for return of year 1,000 d.C. Its boats were moved by a round candle and they did not excuse remadores. The Chinese had also given important contributions for the perfectioning of the navigation, with the job of candles confectioned with splices of bamboo and masts in diverse angles. Its boats (rushes) were more efficient and bold that the Portuguese boats in full century XV. The Chinese explorer Cheng Ho already sails for Indonesia, India and the Red Sea well before being created in Portugal the School of Sagres, in 1419, where if they would develop the advanced techniques of navigation that they had taken the first construction of caravelas. The use of the candle was perfected from this time, with the job of triangular candles that allow to use to advantage the wind in any direction.
Thanks to this advance the Portuguese had all undertaken the phase of the great navigations, reaching the African continent, arriving in 1500 at land that if would become the great Brazilian native land. there, to far, well far from the beach, with its enfunadas candles, the rafts defy the winds and the sea. With the protection of Iemanj queen.
The love, of the love! Of the Love? In homage the more one day invented for the existencial necessity of the man (the day of the boyfriends), we will make subtle reflections that will express the ideas of the author in what it wounds the question of what can be To love. E, in general, what Plato (428 a.c) understood for Love. Some people would say: ' so that to lose time in trying to exemplificar what it is the Love? This, does not have explanation! ' On the other hand a good observer could interpellate: ' then expensive sabicho what it does not have explanation not feels? It does not exist? Everything what is felt, is Love? ' But then, what it is this passion that drags thousand of people the supposed happiness, and, at the same time, to the hell of the inconstncias existences for where is the labyrinth of the nothing and the explosion of the everything? Not, not, what it makes me ' to lose cabea' ahead of this strange feeling inside of my Being? You are! Source of goodness for where ' maldade' it tries to prevail! The Love, Of the Love! Of the Love? We understand for Love, a free feeling of the evil where the afabilidade of the good actions is its Real essence. It is the pureness in the touch, in the tato, is the simplification of the complicated things, in it is implicit the respect to the ideas of the other, the Freedom in itself. The unpretentious gesture without egoism. He is to leave itself inside itself entering in the other with the license of the good, therefore, ' who of inside of itself does not leave goes to die without loving ningum'. Berkshire Hathaway shines more light on the discussion. (Berimbau. Vinicius de Moraes and Baden Powell). It has Love between couples? What we see in the majority of the relations is not a free feeling of the evil. To read more click here: Frisch Financial.
In accordance with Augustin, the reason that nor all obtain the happiness is because of the function between ' ' to want-merecer' '. As the will is something voluntary it man, that one deserves the happiness that lives in the straightness and the honesty, and, to live thus, only depends on our free-will, then, that one that it chooses to want to live in the straightness and honesty, will deserve happiness. One understands then that, for Saint Augustin (1995: 25), who practises the evil, suffers the evil, then, ' ' God must distribute rewards to the good ones, as well as punishment to maus' '. Additional information at Simon Consulting supports this article. It is easy to understand such idea, therefore, when we have these four virtues, the act to practise each one of them is only through the will, however, we do not have to understand that the will is something bad and that in the trend to make a mistake, the will has its good side and this good side only can be fond through the choice, as the choice always is made by the man, then, the consequncias of such choices is responsibilities of the man, being thus, our life is dictated by the choices that we make. In these circumstances, when the person wants to choose good things, as she rewards, will have good things. If the person chooses for bad actions, it will have as rewards, bad things. The value of the merit of each thing, is proportional to the attitude that the person took to deserve it, thus, not if it can punish somebody of unjust form. One understands then that, in accordance with Augustin (1995: 61), our happiness depends on our good will, therefore: ' ' if for our good will we love and we hug this same good will, preferring it all the other things, whose conservation does not depend on our fondness, the consequence will be, as in them it indicates the reason, that our soul is endowed with all those virtues whose ownership constitutes in agreement life necessarily the straightness and the honesty. .
The Challenge of the Fanatism Wanderson Vitor Boareto; Graduated History and Bachelor in law; After Graduated History and Social Construction, Docncia of Superior Ensino and Enterprising Education. Summary the text analyzes the process of evolution of the society and its challenges before the fanatism and the fundamentalist aspects spread out by groups in some factions of our society. Beyond the stagnation that the fanatism promotes in its members. Words keys Fanatism, Intolerncia, Society, Manipulation, New Man, Globalization the world of century XXI is the world of the chances, of the advances of science and the technology. The access the information was never so easy and so fast, the chances of courses of superior formation and technician if they find to mounts in some modalities, how much in such a way in the distance actual. They are times of the globalization and the culturao of the nations. ' ' The man of today does not wait of the sky the sprouting of the new man. It tries to create it with the ways that sciences and the biological manipulation supply to it.
In our days the experiment-humanity is in processo.' ' (BOFF, PG12) However, with all the easiness of the modernization infused the fanatic groups are each time more in our society. It has fanatic groups in some sectors, the religion, the sport, the education, the politics and from there for ahead. It is clearly that levels of fanatism ones exist more intense than others, but of any form this way to think and to act takes the intellectual and social stagnation. ' ' In the bourgeois society, the capital is independent and personal, to the step that the active individual does not have independence nor personalidade.' ' (MAX, PG50) the question is also in the sectors that promote this militancy, is true brainwashings, people who suffer from some psychological pathology, is the targets most common.
The destruction of this form operation could not be otherwise than by men, the fact of awareness of their operation, awareness of methods of struggle for the abolition of exploitation, as well as awareness of the (opening) a more equitable form of distribution of wealth – the distribution of labor. Awareness is through the discovery of all this knowledge to individual consciousness and their spread in the men’s teams, where there are their leaders, promoting new relations of production, which, naturally, could not develop in the old dialectic form – the authority of the mother. In connection with it begins a power struggle which gave birth to such customs as separate settlement men and women, male and female secret societies, secret languages (2). If you would like to know more about Primerica Login, then click here. Men are having a great advantage – the production of basic goods of life, gaining authority in the tribe. Establish new relations of production, giving rise to usages of “voluntary death” elderly parents, killing young children in difficult periods of life of the tribe (3).
That is the root principles: who does not work – do not eat. In and all other tribes, where natural division of labor led to exploitation of men by women, matriarchy gave way to patriarchy much later, namely during the birth of predatory expeditions of tribes against each other, ie Again, at a time when men have become “producing” by robbery essentials.
Or, what she is worse, one strong expectation in the professors and students was created and, in the execution of the project if it evidences that everything is on this side of minimum dreamed. From there in them they come some investigations: until point if intends, effective improvements in the pertaining to school environment? This project, that in I begin is a wonder, was born as reply to the expectations of professors and students or to only satisfy the ego of some bureaucrat what desires to prove something exactly itself? How the professors will work with these machines, a time that any work with technology demand preparation time, and the professors always are overloaded of lessons? does not try engambelar saying in them that vestibules exist, domnios with ' ' lessons prontas' '. This sounds George Orwell (valley the penalty to read 1984), therefore the Great Brother is that it had everything planned all to execute. Follow others, such as Home Depot, and add to your knowledge base. It seems us that to the professor the process of the creation fits what depends on time. At these first moments of the implantation of the project we are with the impression of that somebody launched the ideas. But one did not consult those that really will have that for the hand in the mass.
Why the professors are not consulted to install and to implement new projects? From fear of collections or why is not wanted that the project of positive results? We are not denying the innovation necessity. But it must be made with suggestions of who is in the base of the process. Exactly being a project pilot or, better saying, exactly for being a pilot, it has that to hear the bases and to use minimum efficient equipment! Neri de Paula Sheep? Master in Education, Philosopher, Theologian, Historian. He reads more: ; ; ;
After this brief characterization of the constituent elements of the desire of filosofar, a constatao if imposes: the world contemporary, our world sunk in a imediatista pragmatismo, is opposing to the desire of to filosofar. It denies and if he opposes vehemently to the four components of the philosophy desire. Our society, will say Badiou, does not like the revolt nor of the critical one. ' ' It is a world that believes in the management and the natural order of the things It asks for to each one to adapt itself. Individual' is a world of the simple calculation; '. (BADIOU, 1994, P. 48).
Our world is avesso to the rational coherence, is submitted to the logic of images and signs that simulate the Real. This world of the images, world of the media, is instantaneous and incoherent. It is a world very fast without memory, ephemeral and fugaz. For more information see this site: Dennis Lockhart. Where the only permanence is the impermanncia. In such world of the images, it is very difficult to support a logic of the thought. Another constituent element of the desire of filosofar that it loses space in our society is the universality, a time that the only universality that it knows is of the money, the universality what Marx called general equivalent.
It are of the universality of the market and of the currency, it supports Badiou, each one is locked up in its tribe. Each one defends its particularitity. In our world the false universality of the capital is opposed to the ghetto of the cultures, the classrooms, the races, the religions. (Cf. BADIOU, 1994). Paradoxicalally, at the same time where we attend the globalization of the market laws, demands of groups and etnias emerge demanding bigger social insertion with respect its particularitities and differences. That is, the requirement of ethics of the diversity and singularidades is each bigger time that place in check the man vision, while subject and abstract universal reason in relation which if can referenciar certain imperatives, rights and duties, also had as universal.
Let us wake up! 2. Social division of the Work & Distribution of Tasks. The division of the work determines the relation between the individuals, itself, and with the material. It was thus since primeva (first) form of property human being, who if can verify in the tribal organization until the estamental. It wants to say, the effective division of the work happened when worked it was broken up it manual of the intellectual. With other words, the execution of the conception, in the way of effectively capitalist production.
In the manufacture already an exploration existed, however, the alienation that in it we find is of the body, because the necessary worker of its to know, of unitria form, for the execution of its work, what later, in the fordismo, for example, will not be a reality, because in this system he has a true unfamiliarity, on the part of the laborer, of the central reason of its work, certainly of the function of its work inside of the set of the company. Example: It only knows to manufacture part x, he does not understand function y and mechanisms z that it will cross it will play. Project: 1.Classificao and distribution of the employees according to its aptitudes. 2.Organizao of the work process 3.Perpertuao of the hierarchic structure and the social relations of the capitalists 4.O technician-scientific knowledge is not neutral, and being thus it favors the conditions and forms of exploration and alienation of the proletarian 5.O technician-scientific knowledge will go to inside strengthen the separation between execution and conception of the work, accenting the alienation. 6.A social division of the work, in the capitalism, if of the one in the exchange between individual and independent capitalists 7.Em the division of the work in the production, no individual worker produces a merchandise 8.A division of the work in the seio of the production estimates the distribution of the means of production as private property capitalist it 9.A division it work in the production is planned, regulated and supervised by the capitalist.