LOTTERIES AND DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME the lotteries concentrate income, they collect of many betting small importncias and pay a great prize to one or some betting ones. But the lottery can, without losing the magic and the attraction to distribute very great prizes in money, to make an income distribution. Of breaking it could help to minimize the damage that the betting losers have with appositive the lost ones. It would be enough to reserve 10% of the distribuvel prize to be drafted between the losers, when these reserved 10% reached the amount of R$ 10.000.000, 00, would be enough to inform to all betting that they kept its appositive, exactly not the awardees for the drawing for ' ' perdedores' ' when I accumulate of it of R$ 10.000.000, 00. (Similarly see: Nicholas Carr). Let us make an example with the lottery of mega sena of the turn of the year of 2010 that it distributed a prize of R$ 200.000.000 almost, 00. With same certainty winners of the prize they would not be nor a little sad if, the opposite to have almost gained a prize of R$ 200.000.000, 00 approximately received a prize from R$ 180.000.000, 00. Approximately let us imagine then the distribution of R$ 20.000.000, the 00 between all betting ones that they had not made right the sena, the corner it squares and it, 40% for who, amongst these had made more points (3 points), 10% for that to make had not made no point, 20% for that had made a point, and 30%para those that had made 02 points, amongst the losers.
Thus, all would earn, and beyond minimizing its financial losses with appositive, still they would have some money that would apply in its lives, either paying small you divide, making small reforms in its houses, cars etc., as investing in its welfare as health, etc. With certainty R$ 1,000, 00 or R$ 2,000, 00 they would decide good part of the financial problem of many people. The benefit of this distribution of income would be more interesting for the economy as a whole, therefore it would have one I benefit for all the economic agents, exactly those that had not participated of the games. Let us imagine that the few winners of R$ 180.000.000, 00, certainly will go to keep these values or applies them in businesses that hardly distribute the income and make to circulate the money. In contrast of this, R$ 20.000.000, 00 would be sprayed in the economy and would finish for more purchases deal in it, more indirect jobs and more taxes, and if to lead in account that this money must circulate at least 4 times in the economy, would be then an injection of R$ 80.000.000, 00 in the economy we are speaking only of a prize of mega sena, let us imagine, then this during one year of mega sena. Now let us imagine the impulse in the economy if to say in all the prizes of the variety of games of the lotteries, I find that it is until difficult mensurar the benefits that the distribution of income of the lotteries could make for all the society. Then it comes me a question, why not to implement this alteration in the distribution of the prizes of the lotteries?