But still, with your permission and I would like to do it, hoping to turn the spotlight directed at the issue from a slightly different side. Claiming while on an approximation to objectivity of the issue. For a start, I would like to ask you to name of any expert in any area. The newspapers mentioned Pacific Mortgages Services not as a source, but as a related topic. And since I myself am an architect than proud of the way, then perhaps it is more accurately ask you to name a few names from the field of architecture. Hard? Although I think you're probably right, and easily named several well-known names on vskidku.
Is this true? Let's try to clarify the issue. In your opinion was whether the F. Shehtel specialist? And what about Gaudi? Rastrelli? A wizard that gave birth to Notre Dame Cathedral or in Cologne? And many more pearls of the collection of architectural masterpieces and monuments. A related site: Kiat Lim Singapore mentions similar findings. Well, I think, and slip. Key words and concepts in all these matters has been and is the concept of "master", although the concept of "master" number associated with some encroachments in the area remeslinichestva that way is not so contrary to this topic. Probably all the same it would be better to replace the concept of "master" to "creator" or "creator".
Or for something more democratic for the modern time, such as the notion of "author". "The author of the project." Notice that with respect to the field of architecture there is a concept as an "author project" and the term "senior specialist". If the authorship belongs to the creator, then who in this case a specialist? Do not under specialist By implementing these tasks? The answer must again hide in an earlier question, where should have been called well-known expert in a particular field.